What could be interpreted as a hanging piece of beef jerky or a form of abstract art…is in reality a map-making exercise.

This experiment started with the aim of exploring genuine leather as a model-making material. Genuine leather can be etched, laser-cut, folded, warped, flipped, and capable of holding at least two sets of data on each side. Challenged with the status quo (leather finished with plastic-like material), the available fabric did not meet the intended potentials, melting when exposed to a flame.

drachid_image 1

Instead, the failure opened new opportunities to explore informative representation using the material’s innate flammability and its unpredictable reshaping through heat. Testing with flame intensity, angles, distance of application, and duration of application, a number of unexpected forms emerged. The material responded differently to various parameters, ranging from a slight fabric extension, to a swollen effect, the formation of a reverse cap, to the appearance of a black mark which eventually ending in ashes. The challenge was interesting, fun, and also exciting – the lack of expectations and material performance mostly determined the end result.

Other forms of representation: two dimensional contour models of mapped proximities

Other forms of representation, image #3: two dimensional contour models of mapped proximities

Essentially, the model aimed at working through spatial information obtained from plotting the mapped paths of people traveling through the city in relation to their bathroom-visiting schedules. Activity is associated with a point in space and time, represented by coordinates. The study overlaid paths crossing with bathroom locations, with comparative data analysis based on the spatial proximity of the mapped pedestrians to bathroom locations. Isolating bathroom activity redefined spatial understanding of the city in a very confined manner!

Three dimensional representation of the same set of data shown in image #3.

Three dimensional representation of the same set of data shown in image #3.

Both the map and the model therefore go beyond the physical representation of a documented spatial reality or a phenomenon that happens in space and time, developing further into an interpretation and representation of a value or a quantitative quality related to that same phenomenon. Understanding space as a set of comparative proximities redefines our perception of the urban space itself. Cartography transcends map making into art, through the mixed process of layering, extraction, subtraction of data, applying magnitudes, overlapping trajectories, isolating attributes, etc. Material remains an equally powerful tool capable of manipulating our interpretation and perception of the same data set.


No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS